Harvey Weinstein Shocks with Claim of Innocence in New Trial
Amidst the jury deliberations that are to decide his future, Harvey Weinstein speaks out himself. In a phone interview with Fox5, the 73-year-old asserts his innocence – and in a manner that leaves many speechless. He admits to having acted "immorally," but immediately adds: "But never illegally, never criminally." It is a bold claim in light of the serious allegations of rape and sexual assault against him.
What Actually Happened?
For those who have not followed the case closely: Harvey Weinstein was already sentenced to 23 years in prison in a first trial in 2020. A shocking verdict that was considered a milestone for the #MeToo movement. However, the highest court in New York surprisingly overturned this verdict. The reason? Procedural errors. This meant the case had to be retried – and that is exactly what is happening right now in Manhattan.
The new trial, which spanned six weeks, was once again full of tension. Weinstein himself did not testify during the trial and continues to deny all allegations, claiming all sexual encounters were consensual. Now the verdict is in the hands of the jury.
The Moment of Truth
After the jury began their deliberations on Thursday, they were adjourned for the weekend on Friday. The tension is almost unbearable. What will Monday bring? Will the jury find Harvey Weinstein guilty and send him back to prison? Or could his claim of having acted only "immorally," but not "criminally," resonate with the jurors? The world awaits the decision, which holds enormous significance not only for Weinstein but also for the victims and justice.
5 Questions and Answers About Harvey Weinstein's New Claim of Innocence
- 1. Wie reagieren die Opfer und ihre Anwälte auf den neuen Prozess gegen Harvey Weinstein?
Many victims and their lawyers express disappointment and frustration that the trial has to be reopened. Some express concern that they will be retraumatized again as they have to repeat their statements. Nevertheless, many emphasize how important it is to continue to stand up for justice and raise their voices.
- 2. Warum wurde das ursprüngliche Urteil gegen Weinstein aufgehoben?
The highest court in New York overturned the verdict due to procedural errors. These errors included the admission of certain witness statements that were said to have impaired the right to a fair trial. Therefore, the trial had to be reopened.
- 3. Welche neuen Beweise oder Zeugenaussagen könnten im aktuellen Prozess eine Rolle spielen?
In the new trial, additional witness statements and evidence that were not considered in the first trial could be admitted. Technological evidence such as text messages, emails, or other digital traces could also play a larger role in supporting or refuting the credibility of the statements.
- 4. Welche Rolle spielt die Jury im aktuellen Prozess und wie ist der Stand der Beratungen?
The jury decides on Weinstein's guilt or innocence. After six weeks of trial, the jurors have begun their deliberations but have paused them for the weekend. The verdict is eagerly awaited.
- 5. Was könnte das Urteil für andere prominente Fälle von sexueller Gewalt bedeuten?
The verdict in the Weinstein trial could serve as a precedent for similar cases. A guilty verdict would strengthen the jurisprudence in favor of the victims, while an acquittal could potentially lead to a higher hurdle for future charges.
This article has been automatically translated, read the original article here.