Pensions: Only Up to 2,500 Euros Will Inflation Be Fully Compensated

For amounts above this, there is a fixed amount of 67.50 euros. On average, the adjustment will be 2.25 percent. The senior representatives have already rejected this coalition compromise in advance. They wanted inflation compensation for all pensions. In addition to the Chamber of Labor and the ÖGB, the Greens also welcomed this social gradation. In contrast, Fiscal Council Chief Christoph Badelt and the former head of the Pension Commission Walter Pöltner are against it. Massive criticism came from FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl.
With the full inflation adjustment for low pensions and a fixed amount for those above, "the most essential demands of the Greens have been implemented," commented the Green labor and social spokesperson Markus Koza. Recipients of small and medium pensions - mostly women - have already had to make a significant contribution to budget consolidation: "Those people would have been particularly painfully affected by further cuts. (...) This was the least - and actually also the obvious - that had to be expected from this government." However, Koza stated that these savings measures have nothing to do with a contribution from the "strong shoulders" to budget consolidation. "The contributions promised by (SPÖ Vice-Chancellor Andreas, note) Babler from millionaire heirs and digital corporations are still missing."
Kickl sees "fall from grace"
FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl sees the pension adjustment planned by the federal government as a "fall from grace." Chancellor Christian Stocker (ÖVP) decided, together with the "loser traffic light," in a "brazen act of shamelessness" to cut pensions instead of saving in other areas such as asylum. "Those who have created prosperity are being punished by those who have destroyed prosperity," said Kickl at a press conference following the retreat of the Freedom Party parliamentary club at St. Lambrecht Abbey in Styria. Pensioners have long been "asked to pay" by raising their health insurance contributions, Kickl said: "With that alone, pensioners make a greater contribution to budget consolidation than the banks, which still owe us something."
In addition, the staggered pension adjustment is another "slap in the face of the middle class." Because the higher pensions, which are now being "fobbed off with a flat rate," are the "performers who have paid more pension insurance contributions with the promise that they would receive more pensions later," criticized the FPÖ leader: "This is a very, very bad psychological signal."
Criticism also from Burgenland SPÖ
Criticism of the plans comes from the SPÖ Burgenland. Club chairman Roland Fürst stated in a release: "It is simply unfair that not all pensioners are fully compensated for the inflation." One could have talked about "luxury pensions," "but not when it comes to those who have worked hard for 30, 40, or more years in construction, health and care, or other areas and have also paid a lot into the pension," said Fürst. He further stated that the ÖVP's stated goal of 2 percent in pension adjustment "would have meant an even more drastic cut."
Increase acceptable for AK, IV: "right step"
In view of the budgetary situation, Chamber of Labor President Renate Anderl considers the pension increase to be justifiable. "The majority of pensioners receive the full increase of 2.7 percent, which is good, especially for women." However, Monika Kemperle, the federal pensioners' chairwoman of the ÖGB, sees "a lot of room for improvement." The staggered increase means that those with low pensions are not additionally burdened. "But we are far from satisfied. A general adjustment below the inflation rate would have been a slap in the face for pensioners."
For the Federation of Austrian Industries, the average increase in pensions below the adjustment factor of 2.7 percent is a correct step. Furthermore, further structural reforms are needed, including "of course the discussion about the statutory retirement age and the restriction of early retirements," according to a statement.
Social Minister Korinna Schumann (SPÖ) emphasized that 71 percent of pensioners will be fully compensated for inflation. Therefore, she sees a "fair" solution. She regrets that no consensual solution was reached with the pensioners' representatives: "I am sorry that we cannot fulfill the wishes," Schumann referred to the difficult budgetary situation. However, there was an appreciative exchange. She does not believe in a permanent rift regarding negotiations in other areas.
Signal for Wage Negotiations
ÖVP parliamentary group leader August Wöginger sees a fair conclusion. He pointed out that despite the base amount, a pensioner with 3,000 euros still receives more in absolute terms than one with 2,000, and therefore sees the staggered increase as justified. Wöginger did not want to speak of a direct pointer towards civil servant negotiations upon request. However, he believes that in view of the overall situation, a moderate approach has been shown towards future agreements as well.
The pact can be seen as a success for NEOS social spokesperson Johannes Gasser. He emphasized that over the legislative period, 1.4 billion euros would be gained for budget relief due to the lower conclusion. This year, costs are expected to be 350 million less than would have been the case with full inflation compensation. Overall, the adjustment for 2026 still costs 1.73 billion euros. For the future, Gasser wants the total pension income to serve as the basis for adjustment, meaning different benefits are added together.
Cutbacks on Luxury Pensions
This could lead to cutbacks on luxury pensions. For an implementation that also includes special pensions of the states, a constitutional regulation would be necessary. Gasser sees the opposition as being required to participate. Specifically, if someone has a pension of 3,000 euros, it will be increased by the fixed amount next year. However, if the person also receives a second lower pension (such as a widow's pension or from a secondary employment sector), inflation will be fully compensated for this. If the two were added together, the total benefit would only be increased by the fixed amount.
The coalition negotiators did not provide a specific reason why the limit was set at 2,500 euros this year. However, Wöginger emphasized that the limit is above both the median and average pension (1,704 and 1,840 euros total 2,297 and 2,238 euros for men).
Not in agreement with the solution presented on Friday are the senior representatives, as they made clear the day before. The president of the SPÖ-affiliated Pensioners' Association, Birgit Gerstorfer, said after the presentation on Friday that they had "prevented the worst." The 2.7 percent up to 2,500 euros is at least a "partial success." However, one should not get used to increases below the statutory adjustment factor: "If the government thinks it can try the same thing again next year, then it must expect tens of thousands of pensioners across Austria to take to the streets," said Gerstorfer.
Senior Citizens' Association Chairwoman Ingrid Korosec (ÖVP) stated that without the massive pressure from the pensioners' representatives, the result would have been significantly worse. However, the renewed tiering of the adjustment contradicts the insurance principle and increasingly undermines it: "Those who have paid in more over a lifetime should not be disadvantaged in retirement." The Senior Citizens' Association Chairwoman also criticizes the handling of the interest groups. They were only involved at the last minute.
Pensions: Social Tiering "Not Social" for Badelt and Pöltner
The federal government has agreed on the pension adjustment for the coming year. Only pensions up to 2,500 euros will be fully compensated for inflation, with a fixed amount of 67.50 euros for amounts above that. This social tiering must be abandoned, said Fiscal Council President Christoph Badelt in the Ö1 "Morning Journal." The former head of the Pension Commission, Walter Pöltner, even called it "populist" and "not social."
"It is always overlooked that pensions are not a social benefit, but an insurance benefit," said Pöltner in an interview with the "Salzburger Nachrichten" (Friday edition). Those who have paid in a lot receive a higher pension - those who have paid in little receive less. "So if you give those who have paid in a lot less of an increase than those who have paid in nothing or little, then that clearly contradicts the insurance principle. And that is unfair."
Badelt argued similarly. Those who have paid in more would be "punished" by the tiering. In the specific case, keyword budget consolidation, even "small wheels" must be turned, which is why tiering is reasonable, but in the long term, it should be abandoned. For the Fiscal Council President, an increase in the statutory retirement age is "an absolute must."
(APA/Red)
This article has been automatically translated, read the original article here.